Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis
This randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and pulsed ultrasound therapy on the range of motion in 40 knee osteoarthritis patients. Divided into two groups of 20, Group A received PEMF therapy, while Group B underwent pulsed ultrasound therapy over an 8-week period. Data analysis using SPSS version 23.0 revealed significant improvements in both groups. The ultrasound group showed an increase in the range of motion from 110.1±1.651 to 113.75±0.786 degrees (p=0.001), and the PEMF group showed an increase from 109.65±1.725 to 113.75±0.786 degrees (p=0.000). Both therapies were effective in improving the range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The pre and post-operatively range of motion of the US group was 109.65±1.725 degrees and 113.75±0.786 degrees respectively with a p-value of 0.000 which is significant. When assessing range of motion, both ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy are used.
-
Knee Osteoarthritis, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF), Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy, Range of Motion, Randomized Controlled Trial, Physical Therapy, Joint Mobility, Pain Management
-
(1) Saifullah Khan Durrani
Principal & Assistant Professor, Stella College of Medical and Allied Sciences, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.
(2) Muhammad Atif Khan
Principal & Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation and Health Sciences, Nazeer Hussain University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
(3) Noman Ahmed
Principal and Assistant Professor, Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Karachi Campus, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan.
(4) Muhammad Asif
Director & Professor, Department of Rehabilitation and Health Sciences, Nazeer Hussain University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
(5) Ifra Zameer
Lecturer, Stella College of Medical and Allied Sciences, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan.
-
Abdelbasset, W. K., Nambi, G., Elsayed, S. H., Soliman, G. S., Alessi, A. A., Alsalem, I. N., & Alwadai, S. M. (2021). A prospective comparative study of Pulsed High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on ch
-
Akhter, E., Bilal, S., & Haque, U. (2011). Prevalence of arthritis in India and Pakistan: a review. Rheumatology International, 31(7), 849–855.
-
Ayhan, E., Kesmezacar, H., & Akgun, I. (2014). Intraarticular injections
-
Bannuru, R. R., Schmid, C. H., Kent, D. M., Vaysbrot, E. E., Wong, J. B., & McAlindon, T. E. (2015). Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162
-
da Costa, B. R., Hari, R., & Jüni, P. (2016). Intra-articular corticosteroids for osteoarthritis of the knee. JAMA, 316(24), 2671-2672.
-
Heidari, B. (2011). Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, 2(2), 205-212.
-
Kozanoglu, E., Basaran, S., Guzel, R., & Guler-Uysal, F. (2003). Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift.
-
Mahir, L., Belhaj, K., Zahi, S., Azanmasso, H., Lmidmani, F., & Fatimi, A. E. (2016). Impact of knee osteoarthritis on the quality of life. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 59, e159.
-
Malik, F. B., Memon, A. G., Shah, S., Latif, D., Afzal, M. F., & Memon, S. A. (2022). PREVALENCE OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG MIDDLE AGED ADULTS OF PAKISTAN. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 06(01), 280–283.
-
Martiny, K., Lunde, M., & Bech, P. (2010). Transcranial Low Voltage Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Biological Psychiatry, 68(2), 163–169.
-
Mora, J. C., Przkora, R., & Cruz-Almeida, Y. (2018). Knee osteoarthritis: pathophysiology and current treatment modalities. Journal of Pain Research, Volume 11, 2189–2196.
-
Nelson, A. E., Allen, K. D., Golightly, Y. M., Goode, A. P., & Jordan, J. M. (2014). A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The Chronic Osteoarthritis Management Initiative of
-
Pipitone, N., & Scott, D. L. (2001). Magnetic Pulse Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 17(3), 190–196.
-
Richards, M. M., Maxwell, J. S., Weng, L., Angelos, M. G., & Golzarian, J. (2016). Intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis: from anti-inflammatories to products of regenerative medicine. The Physician and Sportsmedic
-
Samaan, S. S. R. R., Sedhom, M. G., & Grace, M. O. (2022). A randomized comparative study between high‐intensity laser vs low‐intensity pulsed ultrasound both combined with exercises for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 25(8), 877–886.
-
Sinusas, K. (1961). Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and treatment. BMJ, 1(5222), 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5222.355-a
-
Sutbeyaz, S. T., Sezer, N., & Koseoglu, B. F. (2005). The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Rheumatology International, 26(4), 320–324.
-
van Nguyen, J., & Marks, R. (2002). Pulsed electromagnetic fields for treating osteoarthritis. Physiotherapy, 88(7), 458-470.
-
Wilkin, L. D., Merrick, M. A., Kirby, T. E., & Devor, S. T. (2004). Influence of therapeutic ultrasound on skeletal muscle regeneration following blunt contusion. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 25(1), 73–77.
-
Yucesoy, B., Charles, L. E., Baker, B., & Burchfiel, C. M. (2015). Occupational and genetic risk factors for osteoarthritis: A review. Work, 50(2), 261–273.
Cite this article
-
APA : Durrani, S. K., Khan, M. A., & Ahmed, N. (2024). Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis. Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX(II), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.31703/giidr.2024(IX-II).03
-
CHICAGO : Durrani, Saifullah Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, and Noman Ahmed. 2024. "Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis." Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX (II): 16-23 doi: 10.31703/giidr.2024(IX-II).03
-
HARVARD : DURRANI, S. K., KHAN, M. A. & AHMED, N. 2024. Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis. Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX, 16-23.
-
MHRA : Durrani, Saifullah Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, and Noman Ahmed. 2024. "Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis." Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX: 16-23
-
MLA : Durrani, Saifullah Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, and Noman Ahmed. "Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis." Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX.II (2024): 16-23 Print.
-
OXFORD : Durrani, Saifullah Khan, Khan, Muhammad Atif, and Ahmed, Noman (2024), "Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis", Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review, IX (II), 16-23
-
TURABIAN : Durrani, Saifullah Khan, Muhammad Atif Khan, and Noman Ahmed. "Comparative Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Versus Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy on the Range of Motion in Knee Osteoarthritis." Global Immunological & Infectious Diseases Review IX, no. II (2024): 16-23. https://doi.org/10.31703/giidr.2024(IX-II).03